Skip to main content
← All controls
IR-1 / IR-3 / A.5.24 / A.5.25 / A.5.26 NIST SP 800-61 Rev 2 / ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A NIS2

Do you have a documented incident response plan tested at least annually (Art 21.2.b)?

Demonstrate that the organization maintains a current, comprehensive incident response plan that is formally tested at least annually with documented results and remediation of identified deficiencies.

Description

What this control does

This control mandates the organization maintain a formally documented incident response plan that addresses cybersecurity events and crises, aligned with NIS2 Article 21.2.b requirements. The plan must define roles, communication protocols, containment procedures, recovery steps, and escalation criteria. Annual testing through tabletop exercises, simulations, or live drills ensures the plan remains effective, personnel are trained, and gaps are identified and remediated before a real incident occurs.

Control objective

What auditing this proves

Demonstrate that the organization maintains a current, comprehensive incident response plan that is formally tested at least annually with documented results and remediation of identified deficiencies.

Associated risks

Risks this control addresses

  • Uncoordinated response during active cybersecurity incidents leading to extended dwell time and increased impact
  • Failure to meet regulatory notification timelines (24-hour initial report, 72-hour detailed report under NIS2) due to unclear escalation procedures
  • Ineffective containment allowing lateral movement of attackers across network segments during breach events
  • Loss of critical evidence needed for forensic investigation due to undefined preservation procedures
  • Inability to restore essential services within recovery time objectives due to untested procedures
  • Personnel confusion and role ambiguity during high-stress incident scenarios causing response delays
  • Non-compliance with NIS2 cybersecurity risk-management measures resulting in regulatory penalties up to €10 million or 2% of global turnover

Testing procedure

How an auditor verifies this control

  1. Request the current version of the documented incident response plan including version history, approval signatures, and last review date
  2. Review the plan structure to verify it covers identification, containment, eradication, recovery, post-incident analysis, and notification procedures
  3. Examine role assignments within the plan to confirm designated incident response team members, escalation contacts, and external notification authorities (CSIRT, regulators, affected parties)
  4. Obtain records of all incident response tests conducted in the past 12 months including exercise type (tabletop, simulation, live drill), date, participants, and scope
  5. Analyze test documentation to verify scenarios included technical incident response activities not merely business continuity or disaster recovery scenarios
  6. Review after-action reports from each test to identify findings, gaps, improvement recommendations, and assigned remediation owners with deadlines
  7. Trace at least two findings from test reports to evidence of corrective action implementation such as plan updates, procedure changes, or training completion
  8. Interview at least three designated incident response team members to assess their familiarity with their assigned roles, access to the plan, and participation in recent testing
Evidence required Collect the complete incident response plan document with metadata showing version control and annual review cycles. Obtain all testing records from the past 12 months including invitations, attendance lists, scenario descriptions, exercise injects, participant observations, and after-action reports with remediation tracking. Capture correspondence or meeting minutes showing management approval of the plan and acknowledgment of test results.
Pass criteria A formally documented incident response plan exists, has been reviewed within the past 12 months, and was tested through at least one exercise in the past 12 months with documented results and evidence that identified gaps were remediated.