Skip to main content
← All controls
SC-28 / A.8.24 / CIS-3.11 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

Encryption at rest

Demonstrate that all data classified as sensitive or above is encrypted when stored at rest using industry-standard algorithms, that encryption keys are managed separately from encrypted data, and that cryptographic controls remain enforced across storage tiers and backup media.

Description

What this control does

Encryption at rest protects data stored on persistent media (disk, tape, object storage, databases) by transforming it into ciphertext using cryptographic algorithms, ensuring confidentiality even if physical media is compromised or accessed without authorization. This control typically involves full-disk encryption (FDE), file-system encryption, database transparent data encryption (TDE), or application-level encryption with centralized key management systems (KMS) maintaining cryptographic keys separately from encrypted data. It mitigates unauthorized data disclosure from theft, improper disposal, snapshot exposure, or insider access to storage infrastructure.

Control objective

What auditing this proves

Demonstrate that all data classified as sensitive or above is encrypted when stored at rest using industry-standard algorithms, that encryption keys are managed separately from encrypted data, and that cryptographic controls remain enforced across storage tiers and backup media.

Associated risks

Risks this control addresses

  • Unauthorized access to sensitive data through physical theft of servers, laptops, hard drives, or backup tapes
  • Data exposure via improper disposal or decommissioning of storage media without secure erasure
  • Insider threats from system administrators or cloud operators accessing raw storage volumes or snapshots without application-layer authorization
  • Regulatory non-compliance resulting in fines or legal liability for exposing personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), or payment card data
  • Cloud provider breaches or misconfigured object storage buckets exposing unencrypted customer data to external attackers
  • Data exfiltration through compromised hypervisor or storage infrastructure without detection due to plaintext visibility
  • Loss of customer trust and reputational damage following public disclosure of unencrypted data breach

Live threat patterns this control mitigates:

MEDIUM Alleged data breach of MHz Group A forum post claims that MHz Group, a UAE-based management consulting and software development company, suffered a data… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of Egyptian Maritime Transport & Logistics Sector The poster claims to have made available a leaked database from Egypts Maritime Transport & Logistics Sector, allegedly… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of automotive dealership group (M Group) A poster on UpDap claims to have leaked data from M Group, a multinational conglomerate and major General… MEDIUM Alleged leak of Israel Government documents A post claims to share over 200,000 documents (45GB) allegedly leaked from the Knesset of Israel and other… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of Iraq Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) Officials The poster claims to have leaked a database of officials from Iraqs Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) dating from… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of IMAJBET Turkish online casino A poster claims to have leaked a database of 42,000 users from IMAJBET, a Turkish online casino, including… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of Ashur University A threat actor leaked a database allegedly belonging to Ashur University (au.edu.iq) in Iraq, attributed to Anka Team,… MEDIUM Alleged sharing of collected Telegram member lists The poster claims to have collected Telegram members from groups and channels related to crypto, casino, freelance, NFT,… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of Privatization Holding Company (PHC.com.jo) The poster claims to have made available stolen source code from PHC.com.jo, a Jordanian energy and industry company,… MEDIUM Alleged data breach of ohn-law.com Israeli legal-case website MEDIUM Alleged data breach of thezebra.co.il MEDIUM Alleged sharing of Kuwait drivers license template/document MEDIUM Request for Telegram database (ID to phone number) A forum member requested a Telegram database mapping user IDs to phone numbers. No sale or leak has… MEDIUM Alleged data breach and leak of Qiam Real Estate (Saudi Arabia) The threat actor claims to have hacked qiam.com.sa, a Saudi Arabian real estate website, extracting its databases and… MEDIUM Alleged data breach and leak of Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University-affiliated… The actor claims to have hacked tahoor.ae, a college affiliated with Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, extracting databases and… MEDIUM Alleged leak of Iraqi Ewane account data A forum post shares a Mega.nz link claiming to leak account data associated with Ewane in Iraq, gated… MEDIUM Alleged leak of EPS Tech R&D documents linked to Israeli Air Force A threat actor known as Handala claims to have leaked top-secret design documents for electronic equipment used by… CRITICAL APT Group Runs Espionage and Crypto Fraud Operations Side by Side Jewelbug is a China-based hackers-for-hire group conducting parallel operations: espionage campaigns targeting government ministries and militaries across the… MEDIUM ANADOLUBANK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 0.4 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM THY By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Aviation Volume: 4.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 HIGH JOHNSON & JOHNSON By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Healthcare / Pharmaceutical Volume: 1.9 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM TOGG By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Gebze, Turkey Sector: Automotive Volume: 1.1 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM KUVEYT TURK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 0.8 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM FINANSBANK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 2.3 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 HIGH ASELSAN By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Ankara, Turkey Sector: Defense / Electronics Volume: 4.5 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM A101 By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Grocery / Retail Volume: 0.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM ANADOLU SİGORTA By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Insurance Volume: 1.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM HYUNDAI By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Automotive Volume: 1.5 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM DOĞAN HOLDİNG By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Media / Energy Conglomerate Volume: 3.1 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM Alleged data breach of Axcera.io A forum post claims Axcera, a fintech infrastructure provider operating in the UAE and Cyprus, was hacked by…

Testing procedure

How an auditor verifies this control

  1. Obtain and review the organization's data classification policy and inventory of systems storing data classified as sensitive, confidential, or restricted.
  2. Select a representative sample of production systems, databases, file servers, and cloud storage buckets containing in-scope data across all business units and environments.
  3. For each sampled system, inspect configuration settings to verify encryption is enabled (e.g., BitLocker status, LUKS configuration, AWS EBS encryption flags, Azure Storage Service Encryption, database TDE status).
  4. Request cryptographic configuration details including algorithm type, key length, encryption mode, and verify they meet organizational standards (e.g., AES-256, FIPS 140-2 validated modules).
  5. Examine key management architecture to confirm encryption keys are stored separately from encrypted data, preferably in a hardware security module (HSM) or dedicated KMS with access controls.
  6. Review access logs for key management systems to verify that key retrieval is restricted to authorized service accounts and that administrative access is logged and monitored.
  7. Test a backup or snapshot to confirm encryption persists through backup processes and that backup media is also encrypted using separate or wrapped keys.
  8. Interview system administrators to validate procedures for key rotation, handling of encryption failures, and process for secure media disposal or decommissioning.
Evidence required Configuration exports showing encryption status for sampled storage systems (disk encryption tools output, cloud console screenshots, database parameter files showing TDE enabled). KMS access policies, key metadata reports, and audit logs demonstrating key separation and restricted access patterns. Backup configuration files and test restoration logs confirming encrypted backups.
Pass criteria All sampled systems storing sensitive data demonstrate active encryption at rest using approved algorithms with key lengths meeting organizational standards, encryption keys are managed in separate systems with role-based access controls, and backup media inherits encryption protections.

Where this control is tested

Audit programs including this control