Skip to main content
← All controls
IR-3 / IR-4 / A.5.24 / A.5.25 / CIS-17.1 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5

Incident response readiness

Demonstrate that the organization maintains documented, tested, and operationally ready incident response capabilities with trained personnel who can execute response procedures effectively during security events.

Description

What this control does

Incident response readiness ensures that an organization maintains documented procedures, trained personnel, and technical capabilities to detect, analyze, contain, and recover from security incidents in a timely manner. This control includes maintaining current incident response plans, runbooks for common scenarios, regular tabletop exercises or simulations, and verified communication channels with internal stakeholders and external partners. Effective readiness reduces mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR), minimizing business impact and data exposure during active incidents.

Control objective

What auditing this proves

Demonstrate that the organization maintains documented, tested, and operationally ready incident response capabilities with trained personnel who can execute response procedures effectively during security events.

Associated risks

Risks this control addresses

  • Delayed incident detection or containment due to lack of documented procedures or trained responders
  • Unauthorized data exfiltration continuing undetected while responders determine appropriate actions
  • Ineffective containment allowing lateral movement or reinfection due to incomplete or untested playbooks
  • Loss of forensic evidence through improper handling or premature system remediation
  • Regulatory penalties or breach notification failures from missed timelines or inadequate documentation
  • Communication breakdown between technical teams, legal, PR, and executive leadership during active incidents
  • Inability to coordinate with external parties such as law enforcement, forensic vendors, or incident response retainers when escalation is required

Live threat patterns this control mitigates:

CRITICAL APT Group Runs Espionage and Crypto Fraud Operations Side by Side Jewelbug is a China-based hackers-for-hire group conducting parallel operations: espionage campaigns targeting government ministries and militaries across the… MEDIUM ANADOLUBANK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 0.4 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM THY By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Aviation Volume: 4.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 HIGH JOHNSON & JOHNSON By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Healthcare / Pharmaceutical Volume: 1.9 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM TOGG By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Gebze, Turkey Sector: Automotive Volume: 1.1 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM KUVEYT TURK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 0.8 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM FINANSBANK By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Banking Volume: 2.3 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 HIGH ASELSAN By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Ankara, Turkey Sector: Defense / Electronics Volume: 4.5 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM A101 By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Grocery / Retail Volume: 0.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM ANADOLU SİGORTA By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Insurance Volume: 1.2 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM HYUNDAI By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Automotive Volume: 1.5 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM DOĞAN HOLDİNG By crpx0 Status: Leaked Location: Istanbul, Turkey Sector: Media / Energy Conglomerate Volume: 3.1 GB Deadline: 2026-08-08 03:00:00 MEDIUM AIMS Group By the gentlemen aimsgroup.com AIMS Group LLC is a major conglomerate based in Ajman, UAE, established in 2003 with a workforce… MEDIUM Salem Saleh Babgi By the gentlemen babgi.com.sa zoominfo.com/c/salem-saleh-babgi-co-ltd/372739058 Babgi Group, founded in 1978 by Sheikh Salem Saleh Babgi, is a major Saudi Arabian conglomerate… MEDIUM Upanal CNC Solutions By the gentlemen upanalcnc.com zoominfo.com/c/upanal-cnc-solutions/370526030 Upanal CNC Solutions is an Indian company specializing in advanced metal cutting and metal forming technologies,… MEDIUM Hinduja Tech | BMW Group & Škoda Auto By global secret group Overview Country: India | Website: hindujatech.com | Revenue: $381 Million | Industry: Engineering Services, Architecture, Engineering & Design,… MEDIUM Al Hayat | Pepsi By global secret group Overview Country: Iraq | Website: alhayatco.com | Revenue: $100 Million | Industry: Food & Beverage | Employees: 501-1,000… MEDIUM Sanaa.center By black x Sanaa Center for Strategic Studies (sanaa.center) is an independent research organization focused on Yemen and the surrounding Middle… MEDIUM HİDROMEK By deadlock HİDROMEK is a leading Turkish manufacturer of heavy construction machinery recognized globally for its high-performance award-winning heavy equipment.… HIGH Bergdemo.com By settra Revenue: 42,000,000 Size: 543GB | Berg / Crushing Corporation of America: Demolition on Federal Money --- PROLOGUE In… MEDIUM Hansa Research Group Pvt. Ltd By morpheus Website: hansaresearch.com Revenue: $22 Million Hansa Research is a global, full-service market research and consumer insights agency. They… HIGH India's Telegram ban hit the UAE too. Here's how to get around it India has banned Telegram until June 22 after the app was used to circulate leaked exam papers. CEO…

Testing procedure

How an auditor verifies this control

  1. Obtain and review the current incident response plan, including documented roles, escalation paths, communication templates, and procedures for common incident types
  2. Verify the plan includes specific runbooks or playbooks for at least ransomware, data breach, denial-of-service, and insider threat scenarios
  3. Identify designated incident response team members and confirm they have completed role-specific training within the past 12 months
  4. Review records of tabletop exercises, simulations, or actual incident post-mortems conducted within the past 12 months
  5. Examine evidence that response procedures include forensic evidence preservation, chain-of-custody protocols, and legal/regulatory notification requirements
  6. Test availability and functionality of critical incident response tools including SIEM access, ticketing systems, secure communication channels, and forensic collection utilities
  7. Interview at least two incident response team members to assess their familiarity with procedures, escalation criteria, and access to necessary tools
  8. Validate that third-party incident response retainers, forensic vendors, or law enforcement contacts are documented with current contact information and engagement terms
Evidence required Auditor collects the incident response plan document with version control metadata and approval signatures; training completion certificates or records for incident response team members; tabletop exercise reports, simulation findings, or incident post-mortem documentation from the past year; screenshots of SIEM dashboards, ticketing queues, and secure communication platforms demonstrating active configuration; contact lists for external incident response vendors or law enforcement liaisons; and interview notes confirming responder knowledge and tool access.
Pass criteria The control passes if a current incident response plan exists with documented procedures for key incident types, designated team members have completed training within the past 12 months, at least one readiness exercise or actual incident review occurred within the past year, and critical response tools are accessible and functional.